John Savage - definitie. Wat is John Savage
Diclib.com
Woordenboek ChatGPT
Voer een woord of zin in in een taal naar keuze 👆
Taal:

Vertaling en analyse van woorden door kunstmatige intelligentie ChatGPT

Op deze pagina kunt u een gedetailleerde analyse krijgen van een woord of zin, geproduceerd met behulp van de beste kunstmatige intelligentietechnologie tot nu toe:

  • hoe het woord wordt gebruikt
  • gebruiksfrequentie
  • het wordt vaker gebruikt in mondelinge of schriftelijke toespraken
  • opties voor woordvertaling
  • Gebruiksvoorbeelden (meerdere zinnen met vertaling)
  • etymologie

Wat (wie) is John Savage - definitie


John Savage (died 1586)         
ENGLISH CONSPIRATOR (16TH CENTURY)
John Savage (died 20 September 1586) was an English Catholic, who was one of the conspirators executed for his involvement in the Babington Plot, a plot in 1586 to assassinate Queen Elizabeth, a Protestant, and put Mary, Queen of Scots, a Catholic, on the English throne. A former soldier, Savage was to have been the man who would personally assassinate Elizabeth.
John Savage (surveyor)         
AMERICAN SURVEYOR (18TH CENTURY)
John Savage was an 18th-century surveyor of colonial Virginia. He surveyed as part of a 1736 expedition to settle a boundary dispute between Lord Fairfax and the English Privy Council concerning the extent of the vast Northern Neck land grant.
John Savage (actor)         
AMERICAN ACTOR
John Savage (born John Smeallie Youngs) is an American actor, best known for his roles in the films The Deer Hunter (1978), The Onion Field (1979), Hair (1979) and Salvador (1986). He is also known for his role as Donald Lydecker in the TV series Dark Angel.
Voorbeelden uit tekstcorpus voor John Savage
1. John Savage, executive chairman, said campaigners were "rubbing the noses [of Bristolians]" in the horrors of slavery long after an apology could be meaningful.
2. However, speaking for the officers, Humberside Police Federation chairman John Savage said: "All of the officers involved are deeply disappointed by the outcome of this review and strongly dispute the IPCC‘s findings.